Other presenters would call me and I had a dedicated project file for each. I spent lockdown recording about 20 hours of radio programmes per week and it was all done in Vegas. And with a click or two, switch back to a video editing layout when you need it. You won't need the video preview window during audio editing, so why not replace that with something actually useful? Get rid of the transitions window and all the other video stuff and have a pure audio layout. You can adjust almost any part of the Vegas interface and save that as a layout. Another example would be the window layout. There are several things like that you'll want to set and adjust to make best use of it. I don't know why there aren't more audio editors that work like that.īoatface's tip for checking the timeline ruler is spot on. Being able to easily move your clips around is such a time-saver. In terms of putting things together, I find Vegas to be faster and more intuitive than any normal audio editing software. The assembly editing was done in a couple of hours. I've done 12 hour readings like this and it didn't take much longer than 12 hours to complete. This makes it very easy to find these edit points in the waveform - three big spikes will show me exactly where they are. If I make a mistake or amn't sure if a line came across well, I clap my hands three times and do it again. I plug the microphone in and start reading into Vegas. Some of the radio programmes I record are story reading (audiobook narration). Most of the sound tools you'll need are built into Vegas and it supports VST plugins, so there's no difficulty in doing most things. It's just not a good way of assembling a collection of clips. It means we can teach people things once and they can apply it to their home computer, regardless of what it is or what operating system it is running. We use Audacity at the radio station because it's free and cross-platform. You can't keep your clips separate and it's really hard to move things around. It's that easy.Īudacity is fine, but it's really shit for assembling an edit. Once you've finished working on it, the updated version opens in Vegas. This allows you to click any clip you've got in Vegas and it'll open in your audio editor. Vegas has integration of Sound Forge by default, but you can change it to use Audacity or any other audio editor. ![]() For detailed editing of individual clips, you're better off with a dedicated audio editor. In terms of assembling clips, Vegas is great for audio work. The third track is for music and has compression, normalisation, etc set to keep things at a consistent volume. These have already got compression and everything applied to them, so I don't need to process them at all. The second track is for jingles and other recorded inserts. So I just speak into the microphone with everything going directly to that track and I don't need to touch a thing. Using Track FX (where you apply an effect to a track and it's automatically applied to all clips on that track) I have Noise Reduction, a Noise Gate, EQ and Compression all pre-set. The top track is for the voice recording which I do straight into Vegas. For instance, my main template file for myself has three tracks. I've got project files set up as templates. ![]() I primarily use Vegas for editing pre-recorded radio shows. Vegas started out as an audio editing tool - support for video came later.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |